Loading...
Welcome to Anarcho-Punk.net community ! Please register or login to participate in the forums.   Ⓐ//Ⓔ

money and bartering

Discussion in 'General political debates' started by Adam182, Jun 4, 2010.

  1. corpratedeath

    corpratedeath Member Forum Member


    14

    0

    0

    Dec 22, 2009
     
    you still have to use money to buy the seeds
     
  2. Bakica

    Bakica Experienced Member Experienced member Forum Member


    951

    0

    0

    Feb 21, 2010
     
    yeah..think you are right :p
     
  3. ungovernable

    ungovernable Autonome Staff Member Uploader Admin Team Experienced member


    4,423

    119

    24

    Aug 21, 2009
    Male
    Canada  Canada
    Anarchism is not "DIY or die" this is a stupid cliché. Yes, DIY is very important, recycling stuff and all, but anarchism doesn't means the abolishment of the commerce. There's nothing wrong with buying stuff or selling stuff, the problem is how this stuff is produced and who produces/sells it. Thinking everyone could live without buying anything is stupid, this is never going to happen, and even if it happenned it would be the greatest regression of all times.
     
  4. Bakica

    Bakica Experienced Member Experienced member Forum Member


    951

    0

    0

    Feb 21, 2010
     
    I dont understand this part. its same shit if you buy drink from Coca-Cola or I someone else isnt it?you are supporting money when you buy something and that means you support the system or you must support it ( buy food and stuff) becouse other way you will die. or I missed the point :/
     
  5. ungovernable

    ungovernable Autonome Staff Member Uploader Admin Team Experienced member


    4,423

    119

    24

    Aug 21, 2009
    Male
    Canada  Canada
    No. If coca-cola wasn't a shitty multinational exploiting poor countries, killing syndicalists in colombia and destroying worker's rights everywhere (plus many other arguments), there would be nothing wrong with buying coca-cola (although maybe we should make it an healthier product without asparthame and all the other shit in it).

    Why do you think that anarchists support independent restaurents but say to boycott McDonalds, KFC and Burger King ? The problem is not with the restaurents, but how the restaurents are managed. It's the same thing with any product.

    Yes buying products is supporting money RIGHT NOW. In an anarchist society it would be different. But yes, today we are forced to buy products with money but we should not feel guilty for supporting capitalism. We are the victims of capitalism, not guilty. Anyway in my opinion yes we must boycott some companies, but it is totally impossible to live without capitalism unless you live on a desert island and thats not where you are going to change things. To think that you can and must live without capitalism and without buying anything is a weird 13-years-oldish misconseption of anarchism.
    Seriously, i live in appartment alone and i have to use money to survive everyday. Pay electricity bills, pay internet bills, pay food, pay my appartment proprietary, etc... I even have to work to get money and to survive, big fucking deal. Guess i am a big fucking capitalist.

    Anyway if you are writting to me right now i guess you also support capitalism, unless you are a homeless person living on the streets, eating from garbages, and talking to me with a laptop through an hacked wifi connexion...
     
  6. Adam182

    Adam182 Experienced Member Experienced member


    86

    0

    1

    Jun 1, 2010
     
    thats what i am gunna do :D im in teh middle of moving from state to state so i have to wait but im a liitle edgy about it cuz i dont want some people thinking im a poser when i wont be posing for anything but anarchy and peace
     
  7. voluntaryistpunk

    voluntaryistpunk Member Forum Member


    14

    0

    0

    Jun 7, 2010
     

    you can't really steal from the government. the thing is the government doesn't have any actual money of it's own. it may hold a monopoly on the production of currency, but it produces no real goods of its own in order to acquire wealth legitimately. the money you think you're stealing from the government is just money that the government already stole from someone else or borrowed from another nation with the promise that it would rob future generations if necessary to pay it back. you're not going to hurt the state by taking it's dirty money, they'll just steal more of it.
     
  8. helenfordsdale

    helenfordsdale Member New Member


    5

    0

    0

    Jun 7, 2010
     
    money is really easy to blame because it really does seem to be the root of a lot of problems
    the main fault in currency is that it is centralized
    anything coercively centralized like that is fundamentally wrong, and should be abolished
    so really, that's all you need to focus on, and money can go with it
    i love gardening \m/
     
  9. ungovernable

    ungovernable Autonome Staff Member Uploader Admin Team Experienced member


    4,423

    119

    24

    Aug 21, 2009
    Male
    Canada  Canada
    No, i disagree. Even if there would be less peoples "stealing from the government", the taxes would remain the same. This is a shitty liberal argument against people on welfare and such.

    Secondly, yes the government does makes a lot of money by itself. Ever heard of nationalised companies ? Weapons commerce ? Taxes ? Oil ? And worst of all : banks owned by the government. Because we all know (i hope) that banks makes money out of nothing.

    Money is centralized because money allows it. It allows the banks to make money out of nothing and it allows the bourgeoisie to keep a lot of money and accumulate a wealth. Yes money is the source of all problems.

    And anyway like i said, you can't abolish capitalism without abolishing money, or else peoples would still be able to acquire a wealth, it would be unequal wit others and low-scale capitalism would quickly come back...
     
  10. helenfordsdale

    helenfordsdale Member New Member


    5

    0

    0

    Jun 7, 2010
     
    i just think that if money suddenly didn't exist anymore, centralized power would just find some other way to control the populace
    focusing on just money, currency, whatever, doesn't really solve the problem
    although abolishing it would definitely fuck everything up, suddenly bring most people onto a level playing field
    but unfortunately that means most, not all
    the people with all the power would still have it, and i'm sure they would find some way to reassert control in this situation
    but i agree it would be a step in the right direction
     
  11. ungovernable

    ungovernable Autonome Staff Member Uploader Admin Team Experienced member


    4,423

    119

    24

    Aug 21, 2009
    Male
    Canada  Canada
    Yes, that's why abolishing money without abolishing the central power would be useless.

    We are not talking about a process that would be accomplished under 24 hours..

    Without money, the ruling class would be left with NOTHING... The next step would be the collectivisation.
     
  12. voluntaryistpunk

    voluntaryistpunk Member Forum Member


    14

    0

    0

    Jun 7, 2010
     
    you're quite right. i wasn't trying to make the argument that taxes would change if their were less people "stealing from the government", just that you weren't going to hurt the government in any way by doing so. they'll continue to use the threat of force to steal from others as long as enough people continue to believe the state legitimately has the authority to engage in what would otherwise be criminal acts if carried out by an individual.


    hrmm, nationalized companies, more government theft. weapons commerce? yes, but where's the initial capital to produce(or aqcuire) these come from? also theft. In the US at least most banks aren't owned by the government, they're government regulated but not government owned. Even the Federal Reserve is a private bank, they've just been granted a monopoly by the state.
     
Loading...